- #Lyx vs texstudio how to
- #Lyx vs texstudio mac os
- #Lyx vs texstudio manuals
- #Lyx vs texstudio manual
#Lyx vs texstudio how to
See the fontspec package for details on how to use those engines to access system fonts. TeX and LaTeX are moving towards tighter integration with system fonts through the efforts put into the XeTeX and LuaTeX engines. The LaTeX Font Catalouge is a great place to see which fonts are available and how to use them.
This can be difficult- but package management tools like TeX Live's tlmgr amd MikTeX's mpm can take most of the pain away. There are already answers for most of the points you raised: I am glad you are still willing to give TeX a shot! The learning curve can be steep, but hopefully this site can help. It worked fine for me on Linux and on Windows. TeX Live is a multi-platform distribution. Texmaker is multi-platform and a complex editor
#Lyx vs texstudio mac os
It can use the same input encoding on Windows and on Linux and Mac OS X. Any tool that makes that process easier for a given use case is to be praised and recommended.TeXworks is a multi-platform editor and user friendly. It's the great output that matters and the time and effort it takes to achieve it. Is LyX a LaTeX editor? Probably not but who cares! Many people probably don't use a LaTeX editor because they like writing LaTeX but because they want the great quality and control it offers. Although we feel that the WYSIWYM is a better paradigm than WYSIWYG, LyX without LaTeX would not offer enough for us to migrate from using two tools Word and Impress to using one tool LyX. Nor would we consider using LyX if it didn't have the LaTeX underpinning.
We simply wouldn't consider using LaTeX by itself to develop our manauls simply because it is too low level for us. Here the LaTeX underpinning of LyX really comes into it's own.Ī single tool which allows one to progress from high level general outline down to detailed print layout and which takes care of much of the details for you is a really powerful concept. LyX has great (LaTeX) tools for both text and slide development.įinally we proof and adjust the content, length, layout and graphics of the document. Consequently the slide/graphic development proceeds hand in hand with the textual content. Hence we design some of the diagrams for the slides early in the process and write the text content around the slide content.
#Lyx vs texstudio manual
However while we're developing the 'text' component of the manual we also have to think about how the content will be presented live in the classroom. Once you have the basic outline structure you have to develop the subsections and bullet points into paragraphs, pages, section and chapters.įor this you need the basic document formating tools which LyX also has. A mind mapping tool can also be very useful.
Our experience suggests that to develop the basic structure of the course/manual a good outliner is absolutely essential as a minimum. I'm sure nobody is going to suggest one would write this off the top of their head directly in LaTeX. All of these issues need to be reflected in the final document. When writing a new course we have to identify prioritize and clarify lots of interelated areas technical content, scope, levels of detail, learning objectives, skills objectives, presentation, clarity, conciseness/economy, consolidating practicals, course timings, classroom environment, technical build etc etc.
#Lyx vs texstudio manuals
I write technical training manuals which are used both in the classroom and as a reference afterwards. The point is rather than these things being mutually exclusive they are actually interdependant or mutally supporting. As someone who is new to LyX and completely new to Latex I couldn't agree more with Daniel.
0 kommentar(er)
